One of the most frustrating things I have seen as a graduate student was a p-value of 0.06. In fact, I have seen this terrible number on more than one occasion. A p-value of 0.06 means that there is a six percent chance that the results I observed were a result of random chance if there really was no effect. Now, I personally think, when it comes to ecology at least, that six percent is low. Think about all the troubleshooting ecological research requires or how we are often limited to small sample sizes. How different is six percent really from 5 percent?
I am not the only one who is suspicious of the alpha values. I have listened to professors proclaim the death of traditional statistics and the end of an era of α < 0.05. Ecologists are moving towards Bayesian statistics. If you have been around FIU long enough you may remember the prestigious Glaser Seminar speaker in 2014 was Dr. David Anderson.
The other day I was surprised to see an article that was advocating for lowering al…

Why Should We All Care About Frozen Mud?

Post by: Peter Regier
I was recently fortunate enough to get an opportunity through the CUAHSI Pathfinder fellowship to conduct research in Alaska as an extension of my work with the FCE-LTER.The Pathfinder is designed to support new experiences for students working primarily in one field or one location.My project is a cross-LTER collaboration between the FCE site in Florida and the Bonanza Creek (BNZ) LTER site in interior Alaska.I’m using water quality sensors that measure the chemistry of small streams, including the concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrate, and other water quality parameters.The sensors look like this:

We are using sensors to look at differences in water chemistry in streams spanning a gradient of permafrost coverage.Permafrost is ground that stays frozen year-round, and is a globally important sink of carbon.The permafrost in the region where I’m working is discontinuous, and has “drunken forests” of black spruce that grow at strange angles as t…

Diatom of the Month - July 2017: New discoveries await!

In the last year and a half, ten different authors have talked about 19 diatom species from 19 different genera in our “Diatom of the Month” blog series (11 biraphid, 2 araphid, 2 centric, 1 epithemioid, 1 eunotioid, 1 monoraphid, and 1 nitzschioid), and we got to know about some fantastic 2D and 3D diatom art. We reached thousands of people online via social media (see image below), thus raising awareness about these beautiful and extremely useful primary producers and environmental indicators.

We importantly relied on the wonderful “Diatoms of the United States” resource for reference and inspiration, which has so far produced taxon pages for 155 genera (25 are underway), and 851 species (202 are underway)! This was made possible over the years by more than 110 taxon contributors, an effort led by Marina Potapova, Sarah Spaulding, and Mark Edlund and kept under scrutiny by the review board members. The DOTUS Facebook page provides regular updates and features as well as news about co…

Diatom of the Month – June 2017: Fragilaria synegrotesca

by Nick Schulte*
I think Fragilaria synegrotesca is a cute diatom. Although long and lanky (nothing wrong with that!), F. synegrotesca has an adorable, sometimes very slight, potbelly (Fig. 1). 

Fig. 1. a) Live frustules in a rosette colony ( b) Fragilaria synegrotesca in valve view (Schulte 2014).
Now, some boring diatomist (e.g., me) might describe that little bump in the middle right as “a unilaterally expanded, hyaline central margin” and that’s accurate enough. But I also like to think of it as F. synegrotesca’s belly pooch. It brings to my mind the potbellies of seahorses, pigs, puppies and toddlers, and it seems very boop-able.

But let’s move past the physical attributes of this diatom, as the allure of this species is in its “actions”. Fragilaria synegrotesca has so far only been reported from karstic wetlands of the Caribbean and is most well-known from the Florida Everglades. In the Everglades, F. synegrotesca is …

Affordable Robots in Environmental Science

Post by: Dong Yoon LeeEmail:
Let me start with some questions. Have you ever lost all of your samples in a freezer because of a power outrage? Have you made your family unhappy (or happy) because you spend more time with laboratory rats? Have you failed to collect soil samples after a long boat trip because of unpredicted high water levels? Have you found out that super high phytoplankton production was caused by your advisor accidentally turning on a light during dark cycles? It is not uncommon to hear these kinds of unfortunate events from fellow scientists. It seems almost inevitable for biologists to avoid them because nature is full of surprises and that’s why we love studying biology! But wouldn't it be nice if you had a robot preventing unwanted events from happening? In addition, wouldn't it be even better if a robot was easy to program, to make, and most importantly, affordable. We tend to think that a robot is an intelligent object with arms, legs, or at …