Wildlife Documentaries
The following is a guest post by Richard Kern, a film maker, lecturer, and co-founder of Odyssey Earth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not a scientist. I like to say I’m a student of life, a naturalist in training. Yet somehow I’ve fallen into a profession where science is the pivot-point of everything I do. Interesting career path for someone who took 8 credits of Shakespeare in college. So what, really, was the point of getting a degree in something called “Literary and Cultural Studies?!”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not a scientist. I like to say I’m a student of life, a naturalist in training. Yet somehow I’ve fallen into a profession where science is the pivot-point of everything I do. Interesting career path for someone who took 8 credits of Shakespeare in college. So what, really, was the point of getting a degree in something called “Literary and Cultural Studies?!”
Wildlife filmmaking is a craft in which the left and right
hemispheres of the brain are constantly colliding. The trick is figuring out
how two different modalities of thought can blend together harmoniously. Easier
said than done, but when you can make that happen you’re on your way to
effective science communication.
Lucky for me, I was raised by a mother and father who both
earned degrees in Biology. My father and I now work together creating
educational wildlife documentaries. The result is a team that works towards the
same goal, from slightly different perspectives. Dad knows the science. What I
bring to the table is the ability to make connections, pare down a story to its
essential parts, and pump up the drama.
Communication can be broken into two parts: The content and the delivery. The first thing a communicator needs to figure out, and
this is uber important, is the target audience. All too often, however, it’s an
afterthought. Once we have this nailed down it should guide the breadth of the content that is covered, as well as the way
it is delivered, i.e. the language,
tone and pace.
So you’ve got the science covered (the content), and you’ve
figured out your target audience. The next step is deciding how it will be most
effectively delivered. Think of this as the “packaging.” The advertising
industry has this down to a science, no pun intended. For example, you can sell
a box of Cheerios to a huge segment of the population if you can “package” it
appropriately for the different demographics you are trying to reach. For kids,
that might mean TV adds with bright colors, bouncy music, quick edits and a
goofy cartoon bumble bee with ADHD. Wow, Cheerios are the food equivalent of
fun! For adults the ad might feature a serene, brightly lit, softly focused
breakfast table and a prominent plug for the “heart-smart” label on the box.
It’s the same food just different packaging.
An effective means of delivery of a concept is all about
making connections, meeting the audience where they are. At the same time, science
is universal. We are all ruled by the same laws of nature. The effects of
climate change and the availability of resources, for example, have global
ramifications. Concepts like these may be presented in different ways, but the
meat is equally relevant whether you’re 7 or 70. Food web relationships
represent great dramas of life. The struggle for survival. Death. Procreation.
These are primal themes that are ingrained in the human psyche…fantastic
avenues that can forge an emotional connection and a deeper understanding of
natural processes.
To sum things up, know your audience. Polls and focus groups
can be really helpful with this. Look for big-picture, universal themes to help
make connections. And wherever you can, pump up the drama!
Comments
Post a Comment